SAG / ANSWER CENTER
What does strategy and improvement work propose?
Translate competitor gaps into affected pages, required evidence, responsible roles and recheck criteria.
Method and interpretation
Turn an issue into a URL, missing explanation or evidence, edit specification, owner and recheck conditions. Prioritize by impact, importance and effort. Verify HTML readiness changes separately from external visibility; never invent performance figures or cases as evidence.
How to use it
Technical references
SAG technical notes (Korean)
- Intent·Persona·Product Attribute: How to Turn Purchase Questions into Data
- Before-and-after measurement design: How to avoid overstating improvements
Related questions
- What do P0 and P1 priorities mean?
- How actionable are technical recommendations?
- What do content teams receive?
- Identify competitor evidence gaps
- Specify pages, owners and edits
- Approve, implement and recheck
